Some Positive Climate-actions for Carbon—the Polluter Pays Principle

The “Polluter Pays Principle” (PPP) was first introduced in 1972 by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) guiding Principles concerning International Economic Aspects of Environmental policies where the polluter is going to be held responsible for the environmental damage and pollution it may cause. It is based on an age-old adage of “cleaning your own mess“. For instance, a factory that produces a potentially poisonous substance as a by-product of its activities is usually held responsible for its safe disposal. 

In consideration of the fact that the scientific debate on GHG (particularly CO2) as the major cause of Climate Change has long been concluded and putting the PPP to use, it is on this premise that we should encourage governments of the world to agree on a global carbon price for all carbon-emitting products and services—in the process, discouraging their excessive use.

Figure 1 – PPP Foundational Concept

Sample courses of action

  • Countries, regions, and the U.N. implementing carbon taxes.
  • Establish a common methodology of measuring carbon-emission.
  • Encourages the use of sound Environmental Accounting principles to supplement the traditional Accounting practices.
  • Grassroots campaigns generating public support for carbon pricing.

Big Messages

  • Pricing carbon is a high leverage strategy. It both reduces the carbon intensity of the energy supply and reduces the overall energy demand.
  • Its implementation should consider existing taxes that are being imposed on CO2-releasing products and services.

Some Key Dynamic

  • When the carbon price is increased, demand for Coal, Natural Gas and Oil is expected to go down at varying degrees. Renewables, on the other hand, increases as the relative cost of wind and solar make them more attractive.
  • Just like the taxation option, a significant carbon price increases energy costs, which will consequently reduce the demand and consumption of energy.

Potential Co-Benefits

  • Renewable energy becomes relatively cheaper, which can incentivize job creation in the sector.
  • Reducing the use of fossil fuels improves air quality, increasing healthcare savings and worker productivity.
  • Revenue from carbon pricing can be allocated to social programs that can be shared with everyone.s.

Equity Considerations

  • As carbon taxes reach effective levels, companies may try to pass costs to customers, where the poor are most at risk of being impacted. Policies can be developed that limit this impact.
  • Workers employed in fossil fuel industries risk losing their jobs if companies shrink workforces in response to higher costs of production, so job transition plans should be in place and protections for workers ensured.
  • Due to the political nature of fossil fuel production, government corruption and rent-seeking could create the possibility of certain industries avoiding the carbon price due to loop holes or exemptions.

Remarks

My upcoming Blog on this subject will quantitatively assess the effects of carbon-pricing policy-scenarios on the established climate-metrics of post-industrial global mean Temperature-Increase and Sea-level Rise—using the world climate simulator EnROADS.

Standby…


References: 1.) EnROADS Reference Guide, 2.) U.N. webpage https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/climate-change/ 3. The PPP http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/faqs/what-is-the-polluter-pays-principle/ 4. Carbon Pricing https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/pricing-carbon

Published by Ramon H. Enriquez MIE&M, RME

Ramon "Mon" Hojas Enriquez is a retired business executive who now spends his available time sharing the wisdom that he gained from his graduate academic preparations and more than 35-years of hands-on industry practice here (Philippines) and abroad; as an Independent Management Consultant for various industrial-firms, and as a Professional Lecturer/ Resource Speaker in leading Higher-Ed/ Training institutions in Metro Manila. He now focuses on management consulting, education and training---for the proper management of Supply-chains, Strategy-execution, and Decision-support. He has been advocating Sustainable Development and Climate-action since 2000. His affiliations with relevant leading global industry associations keeps him informed and updated on the current and future developments in the above-mentioned fields of interests. They include, among others: The Association for Supply Chain Management (ASCM), Project Management Institute (PMI), Institute for Operations Research and Management Sciences (INFORMS), American Society for Quality (ASQ), Institute for Supply Management (ISM), System Dynamics Society (SDS), and Climate Interactive (CI). Mon is a lifelong Systems Thinker and an avid micro-Blogger. His hobby includes Photography and the Graphics-arts, Singing, Guitar-playing, Songwriting; and Audio recording, mixing and mastering. When not traveling or visiting Clients, he normally spends his time at his QC-office cum studio or, at home with his Wife and dog.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: